approaches
considerations
examples
connections
BACK
FULLSCREEN
PINNED
HELP
ABOUT
SHOWING WITHOUT GOING
Questions
Levels and tiers of participation ~ spectatorship
Timing
Technology
Funding Structure
What is affordable…
Insisting on Presence
Disability
Technology / Working in new sectors
Whose non-travel is being enabled?
Longevity - models of legacy
Payment when absent
Responsibility
Time and space shared
Responsibility of the Audience
Respect
Environment
How often can it happen?
Outcomes
Collaboration vs implementation
Responsibility - artist/host
A relationship between absence and death?
Not travelling due to strenuous visa demands
Preparation
Collective
Authorship
Physical contact from a distance
Which language do we speak?
Feedback and Evaluation
What is the opposite of travel?
Consequence / Impact / Usefulness
How to collaborate at a distance?
Impact
Not Your Thing?
Risk in performance
Control
Power dynamics
Local
Power
Advantages
Amount of Partner Countries Involved
Transcending I-other
Technology access and supporting infrastructure
Imprint
“Liveness”
The importance of being lazy
Theatre staff - New roles, responsibilities, wages?
Out of control
Audience
Finding a common language
A new set of legal and contractual negotiations?
Spectrums
Format
Fixed / pre-recorded
Live / responsive
Active audience
mentally active
physical active
Performer
Non-human
Human
Travel
On foot
By plane
Big / Little Brother
sense of guide's strong authority and control
sense of vulnerability / fragility in the guide, he/she/it needs our assistance
Engagement Period
One Performance / Workshop
Weekly sessions / Yearly Collaborations
Responsibility
Individual
Shared
Audience
witnessing
spectating
Absence
Imposed
Chosen
Absence as
compromise
benefit
Identity of Artist
Known
Anonymous
Technology as
Tool
Co-creator
Presence
Artist absent
Artist present
Laziness as
selective participation
energy management
Responsibility
Artist
Audience
Authorship
Copyright
Open Source
Experience
Individual
Collective
Preparation
Unrehearsed
Rehearsed
The experience of participation as
Affirmative
Antagonistic
Required availability of the artist
Completely available
Completely unneccesary
Duration
A moment
Infinity
Site
Neutral
Site-responsive / site-specific
Technical Requirements
No Use of Technology Necessary
Advanced & Hi-Technology Necessary
Relationship with audience
Trusting
Controlling
Space & Connectivity
Offline
Online
Sensorial experience
One sense
Multiplicity of senses
Location
Familiar
Unfamiliar
Audience
Spectator
Co-creator
Situation with audience
Risky
Predictable
Addressing absence and distance in the work
Address as an explicit content
Address as implicit content
Responsibility
Artist
Host
Control of participation
Guided / precise / careful / minimal
Anarchic / messy / unpredictable / expansive
Mode of transmission
Experiential (i.e. physical, relational, immersive....)
Transference (i.e. representation, audience as observer....)
Control
Lost
Total
Adaptation
Existing form
Showing Without Going
Awareness of artifice, absence, (a)liveness
Aware / sure
Unaware / unsure
Statements
There are many reasons for Showing Without Going
Data and Privacy Protection
Beyond solutions or restrictions
Censorship
Interlinking climate change with other challenges
Implications of technology race
Travel Limitations
Regional Imbalance