approaches
considerations
examples
connections
BACK
FULLSCREEN
PINNED
HELP
ABOUT
SHOWING WITHOUT GOING
Questions
Collaboration vs implementation
Levels and tiers of participation ~ spectatorship
The importance of being lazy
A new set of legal and contractual negotiations?
Audience
What is the opposite of travel?
Imprint
Whose non-travel is being enabled?
Responsibility
Funding Structure
Technology / Working in new sectors
Consequence / Impact / Usefulness
Physical contact from a distance
Finding a common language
Payment when absent
Responsibility of the Audience
Environment
Not Your Thing?
Timing
Local
Insisting on Presence
Respect
Time and space shared
Impact
Advantages
Feedback and Evaluation
A relationship between absence and death?
Authorship
Theatre staff - New roles, responsibilities, wages?
Transcending I-other
How often can it happen?
Preparation
Risk in performance
Out of control
Amount of Partner Countries Involved
“Liveness”
Collective
Which language do we speak?
Power dynamics
What is affordable…
Power
How to collaborate at a distance?
Responsibility - artist/host
Control
Not travelling due to strenuous visa demands
Disability
Technology
Longevity - models of legacy
Technology access and supporting infrastructure
Outcomes
Spectrums
Audience
witnessing
spectating
Preparation
Unrehearsed
Rehearsed
Authorship
Copyright
Open Source
Travel
On foot
By plane
Responsibility
Individual
Shared
Technical Requirements
No Use of Technology Necessary
Advanced & Hi-Technology Necessary
Awareness of artifice, absence, (a)liveness
Aware / sure
Unaware / unsure
Adaptation
Existing form
Showing Without Going
Addressing absence and distance in the work
Address as an explicit content
Address as implicit content
Duration
A moment
Infinity
Performer
Non-human
Human
Absence as
compromise
benefit
Mode of transmission
Experiential (i.e. physical, relational, immersive....)
Transference (i.e. representation, audience as observer....)
Active audience
mentally active
physical active
Identity of Artist
Known
Anonymous
Absence
Imposed
Chosen
Technology as
Tool
Co-creator
Control of participation
Guided / precise / careful / minimal
Anarchic / messy / unpredictable / expansive
Required availability of the artist
Completely available
Completely unneccesary
The experience of participation as
Affirmative
Antagonistic
Format
Fixed / pre-recorded
Live / responsive
Space & Connectivity
Offline
Online
Site
Neutral
Site-responsive / site-specific
Experience
Individual
Collective
Responsibility
Artist
Host
Situation with audience
Risky
Predictable
Responsibility
Artist
Audience
Control
Lost
Total
Laziness as
selective participation
energy management
Big / Little Brother
sense of guide's strong authority and control
sense of vulnerability / fragility in the guide, he/she/it needs our assistance
Location
Familiar
Unfamiliar
Relationship with audience
Trusting
Controlling
Presence
Artist absent
Artist present
Audience
Spectator
Co-creator
Sensorial experience
One sense
Multiplicity of senses
Engagement Period
One Performance / Workshop
Weekly sessions / Yearly Collaborations
Statements
Interlinking climate change with other challenges
Censorship
Beyond solutions or restrictions
Travel Limitations
Implications of technology race
Data and Privacy Protection
There are many reasons for Showing Without Going
Regional Imbalance