approaches
considerations
examples
connections
BACK
FULLSCREEN
PINNED
HELP
ABOUT
SHOWING WITHOUT GOING
Questions
Consequence / Impact / Usefulness
Whose non-travel is being enabled?
Audience
Collaboration vs implementation
Which language do we speak?
Environment
“Liveness”
Technology / Working in new sectors
Amount of Partner Countries Involved
Preparation
Responsibility of the Audience
Authorship
Power
What is affordable…
Local
Technology
A new set of legal and contractual negotiations?
Physical contact from a distance
Responsibility
Responsibility - artist/host
Out of control
How often can it happen?
Risk in performance
Control
Impact
Insisting on Presence
Collective
Payment when absent
Time and space shared
A relationship between absence and death?
The importance of being lazy
Not Your Thing?
Respect
Imprint
Theatre staff - New roles, responsibilities, wages?
Longevity - models of legacy
Advantages
Levels and tiers of participation ~ spectatorship
Disability
What is the opposite of travel?
Finding a common language
Timing
Funding Structure
Transcending I-other
Not travelling due to strenuous visa demands
How to collaborate at a distance?
Feedback and Evaluation
Power dynamics
Outcomes
Technology access and supporting infrastructure
Spectrums
Addressing absence and distance in the work
Address as an explicit content
Address as implicit content
Format
Fixed / pre-recorded
Live / responsive
Space & Connectivity
Offline
Online
Required availability of the artist
Completely available
Completely unneccesary
Identity of Artist
Known
Anonymous
Laziness as
selective participation
energy management
Adaptation
Existing form
Showing Without Going
Responsibility
Individual
Shared
Preparation
Unrehearsed
Rehearsed
Responsibility
Artist
Audience
Authorship
Copyright
Open Source
Presence
Artist absent
Artist present
Control
Lost
Total
Absence
Imposed
Chosen
Active audience
mentally active
physical active
Sensorial experience
One sense
Multiplicity of senses
Engagement Period
One Performance / Workshop
Weekly sessions / Yearly Collaborations
Control of participation
Guided / precise / careful / minimal
Anarchic / messy / unpredictable / expansive
Situation with audience
Risky
Predictable
Travel
On foot
By plane
Duration
A moment
Infinity
Audience
witnessing
spectating
The experience of participation as
Affirmative
Antagonistic
Technology as
Tool
Co-creator
Big / Little Brother
sense of guide's strong authority and control
sense of vulnerability / fragility in the guide, he/she/it needs our assistance
Location
Familiar
Unfamiliar
Absence as
compromise
benefit
Responsibility
Artist
Host
Audience
Spectator
Co-creator
Awareness of artifice, absence, (a)liveness
Aware / sure
Unaware / unsure
Relationship with audience
Trusting
Controlling
Site
Neutral
Site-responsive / site-specific
Experience
Individual
Collective
Mode of transmission
Experiential (i.e. physical, relational, immersive....)
Transference (i.e. representation, audience as observer....)
Technical Requirements
No Use of Technology Necessary
Advanced & Hi-Technology Necessary
Performer
Non-human
Human
Statements
Implications of technology race
Beyond solutions or restrictions
Data and Privacy Protection
Interlinking climate change with other challenges
Censorship
There are many reasons for Showing Without Going
Regional Imbalance
Travel Limitations